Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1196-1199
ownership of buildings in Indonesia, at least based on five
laws and regulations, namely: The 1945 Constitution, in
particular Article 33 Paragraph 3, Basic Agrarian Law
Number 5 of 1960, Investment Act No. 25 of 2007, Flats Act
No. 20 of 2011. Regulation of the Minister of Public Works
and Public Housing No. 23 of 2018 regarding associate of
flats owner. According to Sudikno Mertokusumo, legal
certainty is a guarantee that the law can be carried out
properly. Certainly legal certainty has become an inseparable
part. This is prioritized for written legal norms, because
certainty itself is essentially the main goal of the law, this
legal certainty is the regularity of the people and is closely
related to certainty itself because the essence of order will
cause a person to live in harmony certainty in carrying out the
activities required in carrying out the activities of community
life itself (11). Philosophical and Juridical Basis for the
Conception of the National Land Law, Justice, Humanity and
Sovereignty is a reflection of the spirit of article 33 paragraph
harmonious rule of law in order to create legal certainty and in
order to provide benefits. With clear regulations, of course,
development activities will be more easily implemented and
applied to reduce the risk of losses experienced by the owners
of flats and the wider community and developers. Fourth,
positive law should not be easily changed, in the opinion of
the author as outlined on the previous page, it is fitting that
the provisions of article 22 of the investment law related to
the extension of secondary rights remain and are not
invalidated by the constitutional court, because basically they
do not violate or contradict a The law (higher statutory
regulations) in this case the 1945 Constitution, which is
strengthened by these rules is the same item and does not
reduce the essence of the principle of the length of time
stipulated in the LoGA and its implementing regulations (3).
The ideal arrangement related to ownership limits for a long-
term apartment is linked to building ownership. According to
the authors, the certainty of the limit of ownership of flats
which is connected for a long time with building ownership
does not provide certainty due to various errors, complexities
and unclear provisions related to formal procedures in the
maintenance of ownership rights, for this reason it is
necessary to reform and harmonize the provisions of the
statutory regulations. Regulations related to the limitation of
ownership of a long term apartment connected to the
ownership of the building must be carried out both in the
juridical order and the practical implementation. The basis for
granting land titles for the construction of flats to the actors of
flats or developer is closely related to the legal provisions
relating to land titles related to investment activities. In the
investment law is widely open to investors both domestic and
foreign investment, it is necessary to ensure licensing and
acquisition of land rights such as how much land can be
obtained and the term of the land provided by the legislation
to the perpetrators of home construction stacking, available
land area for investment including HGB, HGU and usage
rights. With the provisions of the apartment laws and
investment laws, it should be able to provide a certain period
of time to ensure how much time can be obtained for
investments and owners of flats, because the provisions of
ownership rights are clearly stipulated in article 20 of the Act
Law No. 5/1960 and Law number 20 of 2011 concerning flats.
And guaranteed in the provisions of law No. 25 of 2007
concerning investment, which regulates clearly and
unequivocally regarding the period of ownership both for
apartment units attached to land rights. In this provision
clearly stipulates the time period for the acquisition of land
titles as stipulated in article 22 of law number 25 of 2011. But
this provision is canceled by the constitutional court, this
makes it difficult and there is no legal certainty, the law must
have effectiveness the law is a process that aims at the law
being effective; HGB can be granted in the amount of 80
years and can be granted and extended in advance at the same
time for 50 years and can be renewed for 30 years. With the
existence of these regulations there is clearly certainty over
the ownership of land and buildings. This must be
immediately returned and harmonized between one legal
product and another legal product. So that it becomes more
efficient from the existence of ease and legal certainty for the
community, especially regarding ownership of flats. In the
provisions of article 4 letter (b) of the investment law number
25 of 2007 explaining to guarantee legal certainty, business
certainty, and business security for investment since the
licensing process until the end of capital offering activities in
accordance with statutory provisions. Clearly, there are
provisions and limitations in the investment law number 25 of
2007 providing protection against the capital offer. According
3
of the 1945 Constitution which is the basis of the UUPA
itself gives and places a right in its place based on a principle
that all people have the same position in before the law, where
the state is involved in the regulation of ownership provisions.
The concept and principle of Horizontal separation in land,
Horizontal Separation states that buildings and plants are not
part of the land, consequently the land boundary does not
automatically include the ownership of the buildings and
plants on it. The application of the principle of horizontal
separation is a consequence of the inclusion of elements of
customary law in national land law, this makes a rule of
ownership ambiguous, the principle of horizontal separation
in land law is a legal product in Indonesia that does not reflect
the legal function to provide legal certainty to achieve justice
and efficiency. The role of the government must be explicitly
able to regulate the rights of ownership, especially for time-
bound flats associated with building ownership. That the
issuance of government regulation number 40 of 1996 and
UUPM which specifically provides a tool in the form of
extension of secondary rights from individual rights or
individual rights is a good breakthrough and should be
appreciated for the obligations or facilities for extension of
secondary rights. This is regulated in article 22 of the Capital
Market Law regarding the period of acquisition of rights at the
same time the Capital Market Law provides 80 years of
building use rights by being granted and extended for 50 years
and renewable for 30 years. This is very good for the certainty
and legality of ownership of flats that can provide certainty
over the unit period obtained by the owner of the flats, but this
cannot be done because of other views from various parties
and conduct a judicial review of the law. This makes
uncertainty over laws and regulations that can change which
leading to uncertain regulations. Gustav Radbruch stated 4
basic things related to the meaning of legal certainty that can
be associated with the Limitation of ownership of flats that
have a period of time associated with building ownership.
First, that the law is positive, meaning that the positive law is
legislation which means that the positive law discussed in this
journal is the agrarian main law (UUPA), the investment law,
and the law of the flats that for the three laws these laws must
work in harmony to provide a useful legal certainty. Secondly,
that the law is based on facts which mean that it is based on
reality in people's lives, the fact that there have been cases
where the case was a reminder of the formation of the law.
Especially regarding matters related to ownership due to the
absence of legal certainty that can be a reference to legal
products. Third, that the facts must be formulated clearly in
purpose to avoid errors in meaning. Besides being easy to
implement; the fact that it is important to formulate a
1
198