Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques
2020, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages: 1089-1092
initial metal ion concentration of 20mg/L. It was visible that the
removal percentage of all metal ions by Gracilaria changii
increased with the increment of pH from 2-5 and was
subsequently reduced as the pH increased further. This could be
explained based on the functional groups of seaweed and the
speciation of metal ions at varying pH levels. The cell wall of
seaweed is made of polysaccharides, carboxyl, and sulphonate
groups. These functional groups are negatively charged and at
2
Materials and Methods
2
.1 Leachate
The leachate sample collection was done at Worldwide
Landfill Sdn. Bhd., Jeram, Selangor. The raw leachate sample
was collected and immediately transferred to laboratory in a
sealed high-density polyethylene (HDPE) container and stored at
4
⁰C to reduce chemical and biological reactions (14).
+
lower pH,, these groups are protonated with H . Therefore,
2
.2 Metal Solution
seaweed is unable to hold the positively charged metal ions. At
The stock solutions of Fe (II), Cr(VI) and Ni (II) were prepared
+
increased pH level of upto 5, the concentration of H were
4 2
from Iron (II) sulphate heptahydrate (FeSO .7H O), Potassium
dichromate (K Cr ) and Nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate
Ni(NO .6H O) being dissolved in distilled water. During the
course of the experiment, the preferred constant concentration of
0mg/L for each metal ion solution was achieved by diluting the
relatively lower and therefore, the metal ions were able to bind
with the negatively charged surface of the seaweed (15). The
removal percentage started to reduce at pH>5 and the metal
precipitation (formation of metal hydroxide complexes) could be
the reason behind this occurence (27). Therefore, the optimum pH
for heavy metals adsorption using Gracilari Changii in this study
was 5. A maximum of 10%, 5% and 5% of metal ions were
2
2 7
O
(
3
)
2
2
2
stock solution further with distilled water (15). The pH of the
solutions was altered to the required level using 0.1 M NaOH and
0
2 4
.1 M H SO .
2
+
6+
2+
removed for Fe , Cr , and Ni , respectively.
2
.3 Preparation of Adsorbent
The red seaweed was collected from a cultivation pond in
Kedah. The harvested seaweed was transferred to the laboratory
in a container filled with seawater. The red seaweed was cleaned
and dried. The seaweed was firstly washed with sea water,
followed with tap water and lastly with distilled water to eliminate
epiphytes, debris, sand and salts (16,17). The cleaned seaweed
was subsequently oven-dried at 40⁰C (18) for 24 hr in order to
preserve the phytochemical content of seaweed. The red seaweed
was not chopped into smaller sizes prior to oven-drying to prevent
significant loss of bioactive compounds (19). The dried seaweed
was crushed using a laboratory blender and sieved using a sieve
shaker to obtain sample sizes ranging from 150 to 300 µm (20–
2
2).
Figure 1: Effect of pH on removal percentage of metal ions
2
.4 Optimization Study
Batch adsorption experiments were conducted at room
3
.2 Effect of seaweed dosage
temperature using a jar test apparatus comprised of six rotor
paddles connected to a speed controller to adjust the rotational
speed of the rotor paddles. Glass beakers of 1 litre volume was
filled with 100ml leachate and desired amounts of seaweed was
added. The solution was stirred for different contact time. After
the reaction, the solution was allowed to settle and collected for
heavy metals analysis (23). The supernatant was filtered using a
glass microfibre filter to detach the solid and liquid phases. The
precipitant was analysed for residual heavy metals concentration
in the leachate (24) using atomic absorption spectrometry (25).
The similar method was used throughout the experiment to
investigate the effect of different parameters: pH level, seaweed
dosage, rpm, and contact time on the adsorption rate.
Seaweed dosage is one of the fundamental parameters in
determining the optimum uptake of heavy metals. Therefore, the
effect of seaweed dosage was studied by varying composition.
Figure 2 shows that metal ion removal is proportional to the
increasing seaweed dosage. As the mass increased from 2g to 10g,
the removal percentage increased as well (28–30). As per the
studied dosage range, 10g of seaweed is the optimum composition
for maximum metal ion uptake for all three metals (31). Higher
dosage offers higher surface area or greater active sites for
binding of a constant metal ion concentration. Therefore, more
metal ions bind on the surface of the seaweed and increased the
removal rate (32). A maximum of 60%, 25% and 20% of metal
2
+
6+
2+
ions were removed for Fe , Cr , and Ni , respectively.
3
Results and Discussions
3
.3 Effect of agitational speed
Figure 3 illustrates the effect of agitation speed of the rotor
3
.1 Effect of pH
One of the major parameters in deciding the maximum
towards the heavy metals uptake by Gracilari Changii. The effect
was studied within the range of 10-100 rpm. The results showed
that the maximum removal of heavy metal ions occurred at 50
rpm. At lower agitation speed, the seaweed aggregated and did
not spread within the liquid. Therefore, the active binding sites of
the bottom layer were covered and not available for metal
binding, while only the upper layer of the adsorbent was able to
adsorb the metal ions. Thus, sufficient agitation speed is
adsorption ability of an adsorbent is the pH of a leachate. It
influences the solubility of metals, the surface charge of the
adsorbent and the ionisation of the functional groups on the cell
walls. Hence, the effect of the pH value of the leachate varied over
a range of 2-7 on the removal of metal ions was conducted and
the results are as shown in Figure 1 (26). The sample was
collected at t=10min, with seaweed dosage of 2g and showed an
1
090